Intimate experience during first-sexual connection with a partner that is female

  • -

Intimate experience during first-sexual connection with a partner that is female

Intimate experience during first-sexual connection with a partner that is female

A composite variable had been produced from three solitary items which had been standardised and then averaged.

Greater ratings suggest greater knowledge of the partner that is sexual the full time the intimate contact took place (? =. 78). Particularly, individuals had been asked: (a) ‘How long had you understood this girl during the right time you first had sex? (in months)’ (open-ended; M = 23.60, SD = 28.41) (b) ‘How could you explain this woman to your relationship at that time? ’ (1=someone you simply came across to 5=spouse/long-term partner; M = 3.46, SD = 1.10) and (c) ‘At the full time you first had intimate experience of this girl, how good could you state you knew her? ’ (1 = generally not very to 5 = very well; M = 3.96, SD = 1.05).

How many intimate habits that individuals involved in through that very first intimate encounter had been ascertained by asking individuals: ‘Did you and your spouse do any one of listed here at this juncture (check always all of that apply)’. Intimate habits included: sexual kissing/making out, fondling your breasts, fondling your spouse’s breasts, fondling your genitals, fondling your spouse’s genitals, getting oral intercourse, offering dental intercourse, genital penetration, and penetration that is anal. A count of this true amount of intimate actions participants endorsed was created (M = 3.81, SD = 2.29).

A single-item had been utilized to find out whom initiated the very first intimate encounter with a lady partner, ‘Whose idea had been it to possess intercourse on that very first event? ’ (1=completely your idea to 7=completely your lover’s concept; M = 4.32, SD = 1.06). Chronilogical age of very very first consensual intimate encounter with a female partner ended up being determined with an individual open-ended product, ‘Approximately just exactly what age had been you the very first time you ever endured any consensual (both events consented) sexual intercourse/contact with a lady? ’ (M = 16.32, SD = 4.08, n = 114).

Two-items had been utilized to find out perhaps the participant had utilized medications or liquor ahead of her first intimate encounter with a female: ‘Did you personally take in any liquor with this intimate event? ’ and ‘Did you smoke cigarettes cannabis or make use of any kind of medications about this intimate event? ’ (Yes/No). A variable that is dichotomous designed to suggest perhaps the participant had utilized liquor or any other medications ahead of their very first same-sex intimate encounter (56% suggested yes, n = 69).

Finally, individuals were expected the regularity with that they had involved in an amount of intimate tasks, since becoming intimately active, that the CDC (1991) considers ‘high risk’ for increasing the possibility of contact with sexually transmitted infections, without reference to the application of condoms. These possibly dangerous intimate habits have now been examined in past studies ( e.g., Cooper et al., 1998; Patrick et al., 2011) wanting to examine basic associations between motivations for intercourse and lifetime intimate results, like the initial validation research for the Sex Motives Scale (Cooper et al., 1998). A count variable is made to denote the amount of seven possibly high-risk intimate tasks (M = 1.87, SD = 1.64) endorsed by individuals. Products specifically known: rectal intercourse; one-night stands; sex having complete stranger or prostitute; sexual intercourse in change for medications or cash; sex with a gay or bisexual guy; sex with anyone who has utilized intravenous medications; or sex with a person who is contaminated with HIV.


We included covariates that we expected might influence reported motivations for and subjective experiences linked to ladies’ very very first same-sex intimate encounter. All model quotes adjust for participant cultural minority status (0 = White, 1 = non-White; 84% n = 103 defined as White/Caucasian), exactly how well the participant remembered the intimate contact (for example., ‘Overall, how good can you feel you’ll keep in mind everything you thought or felt following the event? ’, 1 = generally not very to 5= very well; M = 3.38, SD = 1.27, n = 122), religiosity (i.e., composite of two standard products: need for religion/spirituality 1 = Not essential; 4 = very important; M = 2.09, SD = 1.09 and frequency of church attendance 1 = Never; 6 = once weekly, M = 2.39, SD = 1.45; Spearman-Brown reliability coefficient: ? =. 79) and social desirability (ie., Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability Scale; Crowne & Marlowe, 1960; Response scale: 1 = real, 2 = False; ? =. 63, M = 4.82, SD = 2.01). Finally, we also adjusted quotes centered on self-reported reputation for youth intimate attack, molestation, or forcible/unwanted intercourse (0 = no reputation for intimate attack, 1 = self-reported intimate assault occurring before age 18; around 25% of individuals n = 30 reported a history of youth intimate punishment).